Earlier on this blog, I posted something about the BASIC language on Linux.
It turns out that all the tools mentioned in this posting are available on Raspberry Pi computers too. In fact, BWBASIC, FreeBasic and Geany work in the exact same way.
Earlier on this blog, I posted something about the BASIC language on Linux.
It turns out that all the tools mentioned in this posting are available on Raspberry Pi computers too. In fact, BWBASIC, FreeBasic and Geany work in the exact same way.
Raspberry Pi computers may not always have the best amount of RAM available. For small embedded applications, this is just perfect, no precious ram wasted by remaining empty.
However, depending on the application, more memory might be required. The fallback would be virtual memory. In big server installations, swap is not even a topic. However, if an SD-card is were the files live on, SWAP is somewhat out of the picture.
If CPU power is not an issue, ZRAM might be a solution of the RAM-shortage of an RPi-application.
While my RPi500 has plenty of RAM, I installed ZRAM anyways.
This is what my present memory situation looks like:
total used free shared buff/cache available
Mem: 8131616 835544 6173708 103560 1315828 7296072
Swap: 4270584 0 4270584
Who does not remember the good old times when all (home) computers came with BASIC. To recreate the good old time feeling, BASIC had to be back on my Linux systems.
I figured out a combination of bwbasic and FreeBasic.
The Bywater BASIC interpreter offers an interactive environment, similar to GW-BASIC. With a tiny trick, bwbasic can be used in a batch mode directly from shell. The "trick" being using the SYSTEM or QUIT statement at the end of the code, rather than the END statement. Here is an example:
10 for i=0 to 10
20 gosub 100
30 next
40 ?
50 system
100 ? i;
110 return
Line numbers are not necessary, however, line numbers allow to edit the code in the bwbasics interactive environment.
Sometimes, one might want to compile a program. In comes the FreeBasic compiler. It is important to point out that bwbasic and FreeBasic are not 100% compatible. I order successfully compile code as displayed above, one needs to the a "-lang" option. I found "fbc -lang qb [filename]" to work fine.
Another remark, while SYSTEM and QUIT are equivalents under bwbasic, fbc does understand SYSTEM, but not QUIT.
One interesting comparison is the performance of the interpreter and the compiled code.
Interpreter:
$ time bwbasic count.bas
Bywater BASIC Interpreter/Shell, version 2.20 patch level 2
Copyright (c) 1993, Ted A. Campbell
Copyright (c) 1995-1997, Jon B. Volkoff
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
real 0m0.007s
user 0m0.003s
sys 0m0.004s
In my previous post. I discussed the use of a Dell Wyse 5060 thing client. There is a better option, which meanwhile made it into my collection, the Dell Wyse 5070.
The version I got is equipped with a 16GB onboard eMMC device, which is big enough for a small Linux installation. My joice fell on Xubuntu Minimal. With some additional software installed, 48% of the eMMC drive are used, roughly 6.5GB.
To keep things simple, I am using an external 2TB USB3 HDD. This disk is partitioned into a Linux swap and an ext4 partition. The ext4 partition serves as home-drive.
Swapping over USB3 is certainly not ideal. However, with only 4GB RAM, swap is desireable. In order to improve on the swap situation, zram takes care of part of the virtual memory. The total virtual memory is now 4GB (HDD) + 1.8GB (zram).
OMG, it has been over a year since I posted last... I am so sorry! The COVID-19 situation gave me some sort of reluctance, in which I indulged, watching other folks' work. My Raspberry Pi projects were quiet too. I simply tried to focus on growing a business... Has that worked? Maybe!
Anyway, for my business, I figured that my (t)rusty old dual core Celeron NUC was not cutting it any longer. I like the NUC, but, it might do better service to me as an Owncloud server or something alike. So, in replacing my authoring workstation, I was looking for silent (!) alternatives. When I was employed, many years ago, I was given a "thin client" to connect with the company's servers. This thing was fully passively cooled and silent but butt ugly. Not sure what brand it was, and this is not important either.
So, in recall of what the silence during my thin client usage was, I started researching on a suitable thin client for my own business. The distinction here is that there is no intention to use the thin client as intended by the manufacturer. The original plan was to replace my (t)rusty old NUC, with something more silent and more powerful.
The research of tech and availability got me to the Dell Wyse range, in particular the 5060 model. And here is why:
![]() |
DELL WYSE 5060 |
![]() |
SATA SSD module |
![]() |
installed SODIMM module |
![]() |
SODIMM module removed, showing 2nd slot below |
![]() |
2 SODIMM slots used |
![]() |
SanDisk SSD plus 240 GB |
![]() |
On the left: 8 GB SSD module, on the right: 240 GB SSD |
![]() |
Sandisk 240 GB SSD pcb installed |
My RPi400 evolves more and more into my daily driver for my office activities. Here and there I got paper documents to share, so I needed to scan those, for sending them as PDFs around the world.
Many year ago, I purchased a Canon LiDE 30 USB scanner. This scanner is powered by the USB connection only. Until today, I used this particular scanner on a powered USB hub, thinking the power draw would be to great for the RPi400.
Well, I was wrong. Today, I hooked the scanner up to one of the USB3 ports of the RPi400 directly and the scanner worked perfectly.
If you wonder, the Canon LiDE 30 is supported up to Windows Vista 32bit or Mac OS X 10.5 (Leopard) and won't work on anything more modern than that in Microsoft or Apple environments.
However, we are in good luck with linux and the "sane" environment.
On Raspberry Pi linux systems, XSane is available. To my surprise, the RPi400 delivers sufficient current on the USB3 connectors to power my Canon LiDE 30 scanner.